The Cloverfield Monster Is Dead!!!! No!

black_smith32 · 05-07-2008, 04:49 PM

JJ abrams has recently revelaed the fate of the monster in a new rolling stones magazine, this is what he says. "JJ: Yes, he's dead. Ultimately the bombs kill him." source:http://cloverfieldclues.blogspot.com...long-live.html

Thaloom · 05-07-2008, 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by black_smith32

JJ abrams has recently revelaed the fate of the monster in a new rolling stones magazine, this is what he says. "JJ: Yes, he's dead. Ultimately the bombs kill him." source:http://cloverfieldclues.blogspot.com...long-live.html

Ultimately doesn't mean its dead at the end of the first movie. And really, if the military kept dropping more and more powerful bombs, they would get it eventually, even if it meant using a nuke.

No surprise here.

black_smith32 · 05-07-2008, 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thaloom

Ultimately doesn't mean its dead at the end of the first movie. And really, if the military kept dropping more and more powerful bombs, they would get it eventually, even if it meant using a nuke.

No surprise here.

my point excactly, its dead!

you alive you just restated what i said

Tanooki · 05-08-2008, 07:48 AM

I can't believe he would just come out and say that. Where's the guy that enjoyed torturing fans with mystery?

nendo · 05-09-2008, 01:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tanooki

I can't believe he would just come out and say that. Where's the guy that enjoyed torturing fans with mystery?

the cloverfield mystery is over. the how mystery was what this movie was about. seeing a trailer for a movie u had no idea about etc etc. the clover being dead isn't part of that experience he was trying to achieve.

Falconv1.0 · 05-09-2008, 06:44 PM

Nooooooo!

Well, hopefully that isn't the end of the Clover monsters.

T_T

Rael Iak · 05-11-2008, 08:17 PM

I'm with Tanooki--I'm a bit upset that he just gave that up in some article. I've voiced my opinion a few times about how I feel concerning the lack of appreciation he's giving the 'dedicated' fans, and this just tops it. It seems like he has basically given up on all of it. "Clover? Oh, oh, yeah, he's dead. Star Trek will be good, though..."

engel · 05-12-2008, 12:51 AM

Well as a director/producer, you need to learn not to get hung up on a project, you always have to move on, there is always a new film.

nendo · 05-12-2008, 07:49 AM

tbh I don't see this movie as a jj movie anymore. I see it at a Matt Reeves movie.

anyway atm jj is currently directing star trek and at this very moment in time its the star trek fan he wants to look after not cloverfield fans

ITS_A_LION!!! · 05-12-2008, 02:29 PM

who cares, we know it was only a baby...the monster in the sequel (should one appear) will even more badass.

05-07-2008, 04:49 PM	#1 (permalink)
black_smith32 Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Posts: 77	The Cloverfield Monster Is Dead!!!! No! JJ abrams has recently revelaed the fate of the monster in a new rolling stones magazine, this is what he says. "JJ: Yes, he's dead. Ultimately the bombs kill him." source:http://cloverfieldclues.blogspot.com...long-live.html __________________

05-08-2008, 07:48 AM	#4 (permalink)
Tanooki Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Posts: 384	I can't believe he would just come out and say that. Where's the guy that enjoyed torturing fans with mystery? __________________ Let's make babies!

05-12-2008, 12:51 AM	#8 (permalink)
engel Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: U.S. 447 Posts: 546	Well as a director/producer, you need to learn not to get hung up on a project, you always have to move on, there is always a new film. __________________ I'm back!

05-09-2008, 06:44 PM	#6 (permalink)
Falconv1.0 Member Join Date: Apr 2008 Posts: 59	Nooooooo! Well, hopefully that isn't the end of the Clover monsters. T_T

05-11-2008, 08:17 PM	#7 (permalink)
Rael Iak Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 81	I'm with Tanooki--I'm a bit upset that he just gave that up in some article. I've voiced my opinion a few times about how I feel concerning the lack of appreciation he's giving the 'dedicated' fans, and this just tops it. It seems like he has basically given up on all of it. "Clover? Oh, oh, yeah, he's dead. Star Trek will be good, though..."

05-12-2008, 07:49 AM	#9 (permalink)
nendo Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Posts: 708	tbh I don't see this movie as a jj movie anymore. I see it at a Matt Reeves movie. anyway atm jj is currently directing star trek and at this very moment in time its the star trek fan he wants to look after not cloverfield fans

05-12-2008, 02:29 PM	#10 (permalink)
ITS_A_LION!!! Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Posts: 36	who cares, we know it was only a baby...the monster in the sequel (should one appear) will even more badass.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)